|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total University R&D Expenditures, Compared to the Southeastern Average
($1,000's) |
|
|
|
|
|
1995 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
|
Mississippi |
112,789
|
124,601
|
152,683
|
160,287
|
217,064
|
242,100
|
285,000 |
324,000 |
348,000 |
353,000 |
|
Southeastern Avg. |
326,393 |
365,374 |
402,797 |
434,544 |
469,064 |
512,925 |
572,083 |
639,583 |
679,833 |
735,917 |
|
National Avg. |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
856,640 |
897,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOURCES: |
Data were derived from National Science Foundation, Division of Science
Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS), |
|
|
Survey of Industrial Research and Development, 2005; NSF/SRS, Survey of
Research and Development |
|
|
|
Expenditures at Universities and Colleges: FY 2005; and NSF/SRS, Survey
of Federal Funds for Research and |
|
|
Development: FY 2005-2007. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. State-level university R&D data have not been adjusted to eliminate
double counting of funds passed through from one |
|
|
academic institution to another. At the national level, funds passed
through to educational subrecipients account for |
|
|
3.3% of total R&D expenditures reported by universities and colleges in
FY2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
2. R&D intensity is ratio of total R&D performed in a state to its
GDP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Nonfederal sources of R&D expenditures reported by FFRDCs in FY2005
included state and local governments |
|
|
($32 million), industry ($129 million), FFRDC institutional funds ($60
million), and other sources ($136 million). |
|
|
|
4. Industry sources of industry R&D expenditures include all nonfederal
sources of industry R&D expenditures. |
|
|
5. Sum of state totals differ from U.S. sector totals for four reasons:
some R&D expenditures cannot be allocated to 1 of 50 |
|
states or District of Columbia; nonfederal sources of other nonprofit
R&D expenditures could not be allocated by state; |
|
|
state-level U&C data have not been adjusted to eliminate double counting
of funds passed through from one academic |
|
|
institution to another; and state-level R&D data are not converted from
fiscal years to calendar years. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source for Patents: The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Information
Products Division, Technology Assessment and Forecast |
|
|
(TAF) Branch |
November, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/asgstc/regions.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|